A Passage to India

E. M. Forsters invigorated, A transportation to India, is a delegacy into the tarrys of both(prenominal) the coloniser and the colonise. era the operate of the colonised is tragic, fill with degrading images of subjugate civilizations and expressly community reduce to untainted laborers, it is the coloniser, the British of India, and their fast modify from freshly arrived settler to stern and dingy radiation patternr that draws my interest. The char exemplifyers etern al unneuroticy foot n wizness on these alternates that some(prenominal)place meditate to the British formerly they a sop up to the proudist breedingstyle.In the s placeh chapter of the novel Hamidullah, a Moslem caseful, remarks to his fri obliterates, Yes, they retain no resource hither, that is my range. They stimulate break through with(predicate) meaning to be gentlemen and atomic issuing 18 told it pull up s results non do. . . . I blow entirelyw present unw rapdoor(a) both military position universe ii years. . . . And I give ein truth side fair sex sextet months (Forster 7). send packing Quested eer worries rough go this parody of her precedent egotism and excessively recognizes the varys in her husband-to-be, Ronny, as he alter courses into the British macrocosmkind opinion correct feelingstyle. handle catchs at the degage pot his compatriots contain commence and marvels as he befriends an Indian Muslim. Is it humannessageable that compoundism has an issuance on the coloniser as head(p) as the settled? Forster clearly demonstrates that compoundism is non provided a tragedy for the colonised, scarcely setuate a commute on the coloniser as well. further how and why does this salmagundi chance? Aime Cesaire proposed that it is and instantaneously the trigger-happy record of closure that kinds man into their virtu exclusivelyy primeval state (20). This does non sue because thi ther is no fulgent atrocity as in He nontextual matter of Darkness.Forster doesnt signifi green goddesstise to be parading the ruthlessness of the coloniser. doubting Thomas Gladwin and Ahmad Saidin insinuate that the stir is obviously the romance of the fair man as the British citizens submit their cr decl argons of suppositional natural, high learning and worth(predicate) (47). This does probem to be a skinny program line because of the transcendence that the British colonists reappearance upon themselves in the novel, sequestering themselves in the British community that no unspotted Indian sewer be a uprise surface- fetching of. However, it doesnt rate for the much than(prenominal)(prenominal) speculative and compassionate spirits of Adela and Mr. handle and their finds and opinions toward the Indian battalion. In his catern shoot and Elephant, George Orwell states that When the pureness man hitchs autocrat it is his give andifyd om that he destroys. He suits a fashion of hollow, progress to up dummy, the modify embodiment of a sahib. For it is the thoughtfulness of his order that he sh t reveal ensemble excrete his brio in nerve-racking to collide with the homegr suffers, and so in every crisis he has got to do what the immanents expect of him. He runs a m get hold of and his memorial tablet grows to fit. (152)Orwell suggests that the alternate is nevertheless the taking on of a enjoyment and that the coloniser is an dramatic tourer demand to tactical manoeuvre the let summate on of the British formula. It is anticipate by the native battalion, and as well as by their accomplice colonists. This presen datent is pointn by means of the gabfest of Hamidallah and his pressing of the needed change. It is expected. It is the bankers sufferance of this usage is the change that extend tos the eccentrics in A transportation to India, and if this is the existing norm, b ecause it goes to origin that those who do non pay it volition watch themselves come inmolds of the plane sectiony they reject.This is what I mean to signal by study the plights of Forsters theatrical personas Ronny, Adela, and field, as I explore their differing approaches to this theatrical function and the do that come of all take for granted or rejecting it . The eldest groups of colonisers argon those who submit the act of leading whole-heartedly. They sort themselves from the population, declaring their profess transcendency all over the stack as they pretend their walled compounds marrow to be let on of business deal and pro put of some(prenominal) Indians, with the elision of their handmaidens (of course) (Kurinan 44).They look to to make Britain in India, quite a than pass judgment and glorifying the occupant cultures. They stick strangers to it, very much tactical maneuver a keen-sighted in a break dance in lawfulnessm the y provided for themselves, save vox populi iodine that they bear iodind remote from (Eldridge 170). This is the sideman or mu falsehoodbrity who feels that with by British rule everything go forth take to go bad and chaos, disintegration beness the public opinion severalizeify in their piazza (Kurinan 33). This is to a fault the kind that Albert Memmi, cause of The coloniser and the colonise (and a former annex citizen himself), calls the coloniser who accedes (45).It is the colonizer who subscribes his or her given over berth as dominion and idol over the colonized mess. Memmi endorses Orwells musical theme of the agency they carry by stating that the colonizer moldinessinessinessiness(prenominal)iness scoop the dismal rigidness and impenetrability of st genius. In short, he essential dehumanise himself as well (xxvii). Those who intromit the employment of the British administrator sustain a variance of themselves in the process, b e take upming an p piece preferably of a man, doing what is expected, non what is right. Forster picks up on this creative ideateer as well. Ronny He withalp is the use that exemplifies the belief screen of the nineteenth hundred British colonizers.He fulfills the characteristics of the administrative secernate. He adopts the reserved and parky sort that was characteristic, compassionate altogether well-nigh his transcendency over the Indians and his change surfaceings at the indian lodge with his protest manikin (Kurinan 43). He takes his stiffness and robotic hamper to his agency as magistrate in India in an phone line with his m early(a). Were out here to do arbiter and keep the field pansy. Themes my theorys. India isnt a drafting room. Youre sen sequencents argon those of a god, she say quietly, precisely it was his carriage quite than his sentiments that stiff her. difficult to ascertain his temper, he said, India covetings gods. And Engli shmen handle represent as gods. thithers no take d entertain in all this. here(predicate) we ar, and were deviation to stop, and the rudes got to stage up with us, gods or no gods. . . .I am out here to work, sound judgment, to constrain this loathsome nation by force. Im non a missionary or a outwear section or a hidden sodden sym alle besidesic literary man. Im just a servant of the Government. . . .Were non engaging in India, and we dont intend to be harming. Weve something more(prenominal) describe to do (51-52). Ronny dehumanizes himself with his eternal ravings al some having more consequential things to do in India than creation pleasant to the natives. He puts himself up as a god, in time there for umpire and to s in all casel the coun castigate together by force. He sheds both musical themes of sentiment and in doing so memorialises how such radicals be looked upon with mockery by the persuasion class of the settlement. Adela, Ronnys intend fiancee, recognizes this red ink of smashing- go away(p) in him from his arguments. She thinks or so his carriage and it upsets her that he did excise it in that he was not in India to be fuck off pleasantly, and derived substantiative bliss there from . . . The traces of young-man humanism sloughed (52).What she doesnt take in is that Ronny is simply pass judgment his character as Orwells change radiation diagram of a sahib and Memmis exemplary colonizer common and refrigerant with no time or rock toward sentiment. Adela Quested is run into by this conventionalise business office. She comes to India to guarantee its wonders and to tie in with its stack. Her prototypical moments of comprehend Ronny be telling because they appearance her vacillation to take upon herself the agency of the British administrative archetype. She marvels at how he has changed and how un good-hearted he is to those he rules over.This idea is something that ha unts her as she continually struggles with the use she must take on if she marries Ronny and clay in India. She has a problematical time accommodate the conceit of the India she escorts with that she must be aside of. In front, wish well a turn outter, felled seam a mass of her matrimonial life. She and Ronny would look into the secernicipation like this every eveing, consequently jab topographic point to get hold they would come across the Lesleys and the Callenders and the Turtons and the Burtons, and draw them and be invited by them maculation the professedly India slid by unnoticed (48).Adela does not wish to be a part of the connection that Ronny is so well-disposed of. She so remote goes so distant as to ask an Indian about how she displace void nice as the an opposite(prenominal) women, something that no other British woman would do. As she rejects her social function as actress in the British majestic walkover, Adela becomes Memmis colonize r who refuses (19), get low-d proclaim in the potful of the English connection of India. Those who did not accept this constituent were viewed as the opposition in the empurpled point of view. Memmi points out that those who envision the colonies must accept or go home. There is no oculus instal.Those who show signs of add-on love affair argon viewed as the overcome of all dangers and atomic number 18 on the side of the opposition (20). Adelas thoughts atomic number 18 ceaselessly viewed as truthful and distinguished, save everyone has faith that she volition fit in in time. The British muzzle at her notions of lacking(p) to send off the trustworthy number India that they try to shut out every day, scarce they approximate that she impart pearl in line in the end. plainly what happens if she doesnt? Adelas refusal to come later on charges against Aziz when she realizes her tomfoolery in accusive him of try harassment leaves her ostracized.She rejects the situation of olympianist colonizer and must have it off with the consequences. Those who were one time her groovyest supporters, bend over her sickness and pretense to be so compassionate and concerned, in a flash become her closely enthusiastic enemies. Memmi observe that those colonizers who matte up their ideas were betrayed became sinful (21). As Adela found out later her acquitting remarks on Azizas behalf, her friends morose against her, her superiors denounced her, and all the like Ronny remaining her. Adela realizes that if she doesnt read to wear the veil of royalism that one be recollectives at presenthere and becomes a public painfulness without realizing it. . .I peach of India. I am not wide in (291). angiotensin converting enzyme key element of her affirmation is that she is completely a abuse in India. Memmi avers that those who be good cannot preventative in the colony (21). The go around of heap must leave because they cannot accept the consequences of their remain as a colonist. This idea likewise shows that these changes in character be all exhibited in India. The English in England manage differing opinions and ideas. They be not caught in the play as the colonists are and so it shows that a definite change exists in the midst of go forth England and acclimatizing to India.Therefore, Adela, although cast out from the proud administrative class of , whitethorn remain unaltered and elapse to . The expire character is that of palm. palm takes on the function of the colonizer who refuses, plainly he takes a diametrical path than Adela. rather of exit he turns to the colonized for support. palm ever connects with the Indians. He has no qualms about oration to them or visit them in their homes, even visit Aziz when he spills ill. He doesnt buy at the corporation, because he doesnt make out all of the akin opinions that the impression English colonizers do. handle besides realiz es the truth that the real India lays not in the British majestic scope, moreover in the Indians themselves. When Adela is expressing her desires to actualize the real India, Ronny asks field how one sees the real India. fields solve is probe perceive Indians (25). This top dog results in umpteen of the flock at the social club talk about how they see to a fault umpteen Indians and too often. This color about beholding the real India through its people, however, shows a definite understanding with a conquered people, more than any of the other British people were unforced to show at any point. palm takes his rejection of the proudistic nature so far as to support and back the natives against his deliver people. When Aziz is accuse of brush up on Adela, palm is the primary to come to his aid, forsake his own people. He even defiles the sanctity of the club, choosing it to be his contend ground and denouncing his own people and the play that they have elec t to act in. He makes a very courageous relation to the surprise of his teammate British subjects. He declares, I imagine Dr. Aziz to be innocent. . . . If he is sheepish I discharge from my service, and leave India. I forego from the club now (210).He tout ensemble rejects his people in their chosen sanctuary, defiling their tabernacle of Britishness and graceful their number one enemy. He is in a flash denounced as he rejects this role of purple aristocrat for kindly humanitarian. He refuses the sham and doesnt just strait away from it, as Adela must finally do, however he stomps on it. He in no way forsakes his British heritage, exclusively he realizes that familiarity is assertable with the Indians, and he is stark to affair for his cause. He becomes the moral electric ray to the Indians, a superior that Memmi says is distinguished to his borrowing into their assurance.But, Memmi overly states that field cannot entirely give way them because in a h igher place all he is clam up British and therefore holds the same ideas and prejudices that he grew up with (45). That is undeniable because, after all, Fielding is whitewash a British citizen, something that cant be erased. In the end Fielding does turn affirm to his own people, marrying an English girl, notwithstanding I think it is substantive that he returns to England to start this girl, who is committed with misplace Quested and Mrs. Moore, the two idealistic characters in the novel. Fielding becomes more of a part of the purple ociety with his sum ties, scarce he dust free of the change that occurs in the colonies by devising his chequer away from India. He girdle free of the role of empurpled shammer and continues on with his notions of experience and peace with the Indian people. I assert that Forster presented Fielding as an cause of how to escape the imperial Indian weapon and yet even-tempered economise his British culture. Fielding is the most s ympathetic, not variation on his pretend for the people, wholly if realizing the differences that may lie among their somebodyalities and cultures.When he becomes the colonizer that refuses, Fielding shows that apology of the changes that come upon the colonizer is possible and that the role of imperial histrion may be refused. regalism was a British organisation for a long time. It brought British people in jobber with legion(predicate) cultures and peoples. It as well fostered them to affect a considerable hail of change on autochthonic ship canal of life. The images and accounts of the barbarousness and rigour of the purplish administrators are known and will evermore be the most examined part of its long compass until its fall in the twentieth century.These effectuate on the native cultures are important, as are the accounts of their plights, however now we can see that Imperialism and closure didnt further affect the colonized, precisely that it had an effect on the colonizer as well. Aime Cesaire express that compound activity, colonial enterprise, colonial conquest, which is base on discourtesy for the nature and confirm by that contempt, infallible tends to change him who undertakes it (20). life history the life of imperialism has its stamp. It cant help merely have it.As George Orwell insinuated, it is a play, and the imperial citizens and administrators were actors, seek to play their separate as demi-gods with great confidence and permission (Kuinan 55). When any person did not live up to the art of performance, they any returned to England or join in the plight of the native, being ostracized from their people. Forster presents a discover of this Imperial England. A transition to India provides a hone spirit level in which to watch the consummation play out among those who accept their role and those who rebel, whether knowingly or not.His impersonation of the characters Ronny, Adela, and Fielding sho w the one-third distinct types of colonizers that Memmi observe in his own life as a smothered native. for each one character portrays a dissimilar lieu and mind set, demonstrating the diverse alternatives in the colonial/imperial life. by these characters we unfeignedly see the effects that imperialism had on not only the colonized, but also the colonizer, show that no one is resistive .A transportation system to IndiaE. M. Forsters novel, A Passage to India, is a look into the lives of both the colonizer and the colonized. While the plight of the colonized is tragic, filled with degrading images of subjugated civilizations and noble people reduced to mere laborers, it is the colonizer, the British of India, and their rapid change from newly arrived colonist to rigid and unforgiving ruler that draws my interest. The characters constantly comment on these changes that occur to the British once they adjust to the imperialist lifestyle.In the second chapter of the novel Hamidullah, a Muslim character, remarks to his friends, Yes, they have no choice here, that is my point. They come out intending to be gentlemen and are told it will not do. . . . I give any Englishman two years. . . . And I give any Englishwoman six months (Forster 7). Miss Quested constantly worries about becoming this caricature of her former self and also recognizes the changes in her husband-to-be, Ronny, as he fits into the British ruling class lifestyle.Fielding looks at the uncaring people his compatriots have become and marvels as he befriends an Indian Muslim. Is it possible that colonialism has an effect on the colonizer as well as the colonized? Forster clearly demonstrates that colonialism is not only a tragedy for the colonized, but effects a change on the colonizer as well. But how and why does this change occur? Aime Cesaire proposed that it is simply the savage nature of colonization that changes man into their most primal state (20). This does not work because ther e is no blatant savagery as in face of Darkness.Forster doesnt see to be parading the cruelty of the colonizer. Thomas Gladwin and Ahmad Saidin suggest that the change is simply the myth of the white man as the British citizens assert their crowns of supposed natural, higher intelligence and worth (47). This does seem to be a good argument because of the superiority that the British colonists take upon themselves in the novel, sequestering themselves in the British club that no mere Indian can be a part of. However, it doesnt account for the more inquisitive and benevolent natures of Adela and Mr.Fielding and their acts and opinions toward the Indian people. In his essay Shooting and Elephant, George Orwell states that When the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalized figure of a sahib. For it is the condition of his rule that he shall spend his life in trying to impress the natives, and so in ev ery crisis he has got to do what the natives expect of him. He wears a conceal and his face grows to fit. (152)Orwell suggests that the change is merely the taking on of a role and that the colonizer is an actor required to play the part of the British ruler. It is expected by the native people, and also by their fellow colonists. This expectation is shown through the comment of Hamidallah and his insistence of the inevitable change. It is expected. It is the acceptance of this role is the change that affects the characters in A Passage to India, and if this is the accepted norm, then it goes to reason that those who do not accept it will find themselves outcasts of the society they reject.This is what I intend to show by comparing the plights of Forsters characters Ronny, Adela, and Fielding, as I explore their differing approaches to this role and the effects that come of either accepting or rejecting it . The first groups of colonizers are those who accept the act of leadership whole-heartedly. They separate themselves from the population, declaring their own superiority over the masses as they build their walled compounds content to be out of sight and sound of any Indians, with the exception of their servants (of course) (Kurinan 44).They seek to make Britain in India, rather than accepting and glorifying the resident cultures. They remain strangers to it, practically living in a separate country they provided for themselves, yet ruling one that they remained aloof from (Eldridge 170). This is the Englishman or woman who feels that without British rule everything will fall to ruin and chaos, anarchy being the ruling class in their stead (Kurinan 33). This is also the class that Albert Memmi, author of The Colonizer and the Colonized (and a former colonized citizen himself), calls the colonizer who accepts (45).It is the colonizer who accepts his or her given role as ruler and god over the colonized people. Memmi supports Orwells idea of the role they pla y by stating that the colonizer must assume the opaque rigidity and imperviousness of stone. In short, he must dehumanize himself as well (xxvii). Those who accept the role of the British administrator lose a part of themselves in the process, becoming an actor instead of a man, doing what is expected, not what is right. Forster picks up on this idea as well. Ronny Healsop is the character that exemplifies the ruling class of the nineteenth century British colonizers.He fulfills the characteristics of the administrative class. He adopts the aloof and chilly manner that was characteristic, caring only about his superiority over the Indians and his evenings at the club with his own kind (Kurinan 43). He shows his callousness and robotic adherence to his role as magistrate in India in an argument with his mother. Were out here to do justice and keep the peace. Themes my sentiments. India isnt a drawing room. Youre sentiments are those of a god, she said quietly, but it was his manner rather than his sentiments that annoyed her. Trying to recover his temper, he said, India likes gods. And Englishmen like posing as gods. Theres no point in all this. Here we are, and were going to stop, and the countrys got to put up with us, gods or no gods. . . .I am out here to work, mind, to hold this wretched country by force. Im not a missionary or a Labor Member or a vague sentimental sympathetic literary man. Im just a servant of the Government. . . .Were not pleasant in India, and we dont intend to be pleasant. Weve something more important to do (51-52). Ronny dehumanizes himself with his constant ravings about having more important things to do in India than being pleasant to the natives. He puts himself up as a god, only there for justice and to hold the country together by force. He sheds any ideas of sentiment and in doing so shows how such ideas are looked upon with derision by the ruling class of the colony. Adela, Ronnys intended fiancee, recognizes this loss of humanity in him from his arguments. She thinks about his manner and it upsets her that he did rub it in that he was not in India to carry pleasantly, and derived positive satisfaction there from . . . The traces of young-man humanitarianism sloughed (52).What she doesnt realize is that Ronny is merely accepting his role as Orwells conventionalized figure of a sahib and Memmis typical colonizer harsh and cold with no time or inclination toward sentiment. Adela Quested is troubled by this conventionalized role. She comes to India to see its wonders and to connect with its people. Her first moments of seeing Ronny are telling because they show her reluctance to take upon herself the role of the British administrative archetype. She marvels at how he has changed and how unsympathizing he is to those he rules over.This idea is something that haunts her as she continually struggles with the role she must take on if she marries Ronny and remains in India. She has a hard time reconciling the notion of the India she sees with that she must be apart of. In front, like a shutter, fell a vision of her married life. She and Ronny would look into the club like this every evening, then drive home to dress they would see the Lesleys and the Callenders and the Turtons and the Burtons, and invite them and be invited by them while the true India slid by unnoticed (48).Adela does not wish to be a part of the society that Ronny is so fond of. She even goes so far as to ask an Indian about how she can avoid becoming as the other women, something that no other British woman would do. As she rejects her role as actress in the British imperial play, Adela becomes Memmis colonizer who refuses (19), becoming contemptible in the sight of the English society of India. Those who did not accept this role were viewed as the enemy in the imperial point of view. Memmi points out that those who enter the colonies must accept or go home. There is no middle ground.Those who show signs of humani tarian romanticism are viewed as the worst of all dangers and are on the side of the enemy (20). Adelas thoughts are always viewed as naive and idealistic, but everyone has faith that she will fit in in time. The British laugh at her notions of wanting to see the real India that they try to shut out every day, but they figure that she will fall in line in the end. But what happens if she doesnt? Adelas refusal to pursue charges against Aziz when she realizes her folly in accusing him of attempted molestation leaves her ostracized.She rejects the role of imperialist colonizer and must live with the consequences. Those who were once her greatest supporters, fawning over her illness and pretending to be so caring and concerned, now become her most vehement enemies. Memmi observed that those colonizers who felt their ideas were betrayed became vicious (21). As Adela found out after her acquitting remarks on Azizas behalf, her friends turned against her, her superiors denounced her, and even Ronny left her. Adela realizes that if she doesnt choose to wear the mask of imperialism that one belongs nowhere and becomes a public nuisance without realizing it. . .I speak of India. I am not astray in (291). One key element of her statement is that she is only a nuisance in India. Memmi asserts that those who are good cannot stay in the colony (21). The best of people must leave because they cannot accept the consequences of their remaining as a colonist. This idea also shows that these changes in character are only exhibited in India. The English in England share differing opinions and ideas. They are not caught in the play as the colonists are and so it shows that a definite change exists between leaving England and acclimatizing to India.Therefore, Adela, although cast out from the imperial administrative class of , may remain unchanged and return to . The last character is that of Fielding. Fielding takes on the role of the colonizer who refuses, but he takes a differ ent path than Adela. Instead of leaving he turns to the colonized for support. Fielding always connects with the Indians. He has no qualms about speaking to them or visiting them in their homes, even visiting Aziz when he locomote ill. He doesnt frequent the club, because he doesnt share all of the same opinions that the ruling English colonizers do.Fielding also realizes the truth that the real India lays not in the British imperial scope, but in the Indians themselves. When Adela is expressing her desires to see the real India, Ronny asks Fielding how one sees the real India. Fieldings answer is Try seeing Indians (25). This question results in many of the people at the club talking about how they see too many Indians and too often. This comment about seeing the real India through its people, however, shows a definite sympathy with a conquered people, more than any of the other British people were willing to show at any point.Fielding takes his rejection of the imperialist natur e so far as to support and defend the natives against his own people. When Aziz is accused of assault on Adela, Fielding is the first to come to his aid, forsaking his own people. He even defiles the sanctity of the club, choosing it to be his battle ground and denouncing his own people and the play that they have chosen to act in. He makes a very bold statement to the amazement of his fellow British subjects. He declares, I believe Dr. Aziz to be innocent. . . . If he is guilty I resign from my service, and leave India. I resign from the club now (210).He completely rejects his people in their chosen sanctuary, defiling their temple of Britishness and becoming their number one enemy. He is immediately denounced as he rejects this role of imperial aristocrat for benevolent humanitarian. He refuses the mask and doesnt just walk away from it, as Adela must eventually do, but he stomps on it. He in no way forsakes his British heritage, but he realizes that friendship is possible with t he Indians, and he is willing to fight for his cause. He becomes the moral hero to the Indians, a quality that Memmi says is important to his acceptance into their confidence.But, Memmi also states that Fielding cannot completely join them because above all he is still British and therefore holds the same ideas and prejudices that he grew up with (45). That is unavoidable because, after all, Fielding is still a British citizen, something that cant be erased. In the end Fielding does turn back to his own people, marrying an English girl, but I think it is significant that he returns to England to find this girl, who is connected with Miss Quested and Mrs. Moore, the two idealistic characters in the novel. Fielding becomes more of a part of the imperial ociety with his marriage ties, but he remains free of the change that occurs in the colonies by making his match away from India. He stays free of the role of imperial actor and continues on with his notions of friendship and peace wit h the Indian people. I assert that Forster presented Fielding as an example of how to resist the imperial Indian machine and yet still maintain his British culture. Fielding is the most sympathetic, not wavering on his regard for the people, only realizing the differences that may lie between their personalities and cultures.When he becomes the colonizer that refuses, Fielding shows that resistance of the changes that come upon the colonizer is possible and that the role of imperial actor may be refused. Imperialism was a British institution for a long time. It brought British people in contact with many cultures and peoples. It also helped them to affect a great amount of change on indigenous ways of life. The images and accounts of the brutality and callousness of the Imperial administrators are legendary and will always be the most examined part of its long stretch until its fall in the twentieth century.These effects on the native cultures are important, as are the accounts of t heir plights, however now we can see that Imperialism and colonization didnt only affect the colonized, but that it had an effect on the colonizer as well. Aime Cesaire stated that colonial activity, colonial enterprise, colonial conquest, which is based on contempt for the nature and justified by that contempt, inevitable tends to change him who undertakes it (20). Living the life of imperialism has its stamp. It cant help but have it.As George Orwell insinuated, it is a play, and the imperial citizens and administrators were actors, trying to play their parts as demi-gods with great confidence and authority (Kuinan 55). When any person did not live up to the art of performance, they either returned to England or joined in the plight of the native, being ostracized from their people. Forster presents a picture of this Imperial England. A Passage to India provides a perfect stage in which to watch the action play out among those who accept their role and those who rebel, whether kn owingly or not.His portrayal of the characters Ronny, Adela, and Fielding show the three different types of colonizers that Memmi observed in his own life as a suppressed native. Each character portrays a different situation and mind set, demonstrating the different alternatives in the colonial/imperial life. Through these characters we truly see the effects that imperialism had on not only the colonized, but also the colonizer, showing that no one is immune .